1. Leonn 的博客首页
  2. VDS

PQS: 测评 / Hinet / KVM / VDS / 2G内存 / 600M / 无限流量 / 月付398RMB起

 

第二批VDS正在销售中~~~~

PQS,TW商家,经过快一个月的时间,老板已经采购了新的硬件并架设好了官网。上次评测的时候VDS构架为Hyper-v,老板为了便于管理和接入WHMCS,Hinet产品已经全部换成了KVM,并且对出网骨干线路进行了带宽扩容,所以再次进行评测。

老板TG Teson T

频道:PQSnews

群组:MJJtw

本人也有购入该商家产品,总的来说在线率合格,老板办事效率很高,而且经常半夜都能找到人。。。

目前Hinet的600M Vds均有货,低库存。

套餐详情

TPMJJ02VDS
  • vCPU:2
  • 内存:2GB
  • 硬盘:20GB SSD
  • 流量:不限(合理使用)
  • 带宽:600Mbps
  • 架构:KVM
  • 价格:¥398/月
  • 订购链接
TPMJJ04VDS
  • vCPU:4
  • 内存:4GB
  • 硬盘:80GB SSD
  • 流量:不限(合理使用)
  • 带宽:600Mbps
  • 架构:KVM
  • 价格:¥478/月
  • 订购链接
  • 更多商品请点击

测评详情

 基本信息

带宽测试

PQS: 测评 / Hinet / KVM / VDS / 2G内存 / 600M / 无限流量 / 月付398RMB起

出网骨干带宽扩容之后带宽提升和之前相比很明显!

 

 基本信息

本次测评所用机器为 TPMJJ06VDS ,感谢商家提供测试机。

CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz
Number of cores      : 8
CPU frequency        : 2892.748 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 115.0 GB (1.7 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 3948 MB (491 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 4095 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 20 hour 5 min
Load average         : 0.16, 0.11, 0.05
OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 8
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 4.11.8-041108-generic
ipaddr               : 中国 台湾 新北市  cht.com.tw
vm                   : kvm

硬盘速度

ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 53 us / 94 us / 2.72 ms / 58 us
ioping: sequential speed
    18.0 k requests completed in 5.00 s, 4.00 k iops, 999.5 MiB/s

Unixbench

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: host73.vds.pqs.pw: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.11.8-041108-generic -- #201706290836 SMP Thu Jun 29 12:38:45 UTC 2017
   Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (5785.5 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   11:55:36 up 20:25,  2 users,  load average: 0.08, 0.03, 0.03; runlevel 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Jan 27 2019 11:55:36 - 12:23:42
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       31517332.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3784.8 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4435.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1009177.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          290727.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2210699.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2040351.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  88523.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6302.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9078.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   3362.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3672653.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   31517332.7   2700.7
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3784.8    688.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4435.1   1031.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1009177.7   2548.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     290727.2   1756.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2210699.7   3811.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2040351.0   1640.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      88523.3    221.3
Process Creation                                126.0       6302.5    500.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9078.3   2141.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       3362.0   5603.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3672653.5   2448.4
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1537.5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Jan 27 2019 12:23:42 - 12:52:03
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables      192362618.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    27656.9 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              24309.8 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        800227.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          214309.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2362649.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            12551686.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                1381876.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              33809.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  35203.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   5557.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        7434973.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  192362618.4  16483.5
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      27656.9   5028.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      24309.8   5653.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     800227.3   2020.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     214309.8   1294.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2362649.4   4073.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0   12551686.8  10089.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0    1381876.4   3454.7
Process Creation                                126.0      33809.9   2683.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      35203.0   8302.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       5557.1   9261.9
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    7434973.9   4956.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        4870.2

海外速度

Node Name:                      IPv4 address:                  Download Speed
CacheFly:                       205.234.175.175:          12.12 MiB/s |   96.99 Mbps
Linode, Tokyo, JP:              106.187.96.148:           34.75 MiB/s |  278.03 Mbps
Linode, Tokyo2, JP:             139.162.65.37:            13.62 MiB/s |  109.00 Mbps
Linode, Singapore, SG:          139.162.23.4:             10.35 MiB/s |   82.79 Mbps
Linode, Fremont, CA:            50.116.14.9:               6.50 MiB/s |   51.99 Mbps
Linode, Newark, NJ:             50.116.57.237:             4.76 MiB/s |   38.10 Mbps
Linode, London, UK:             176.58.107.39:             3.06 MiB/s |   24.47 Mbps
Linode, Frankfurt, DE:          139.162.130.8:             3.14 MiB/s |   25.08 Mbps
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP:           161.202.125.20:           12.66 MiB/s |  101.29 Mbps
Softlayer, Singapore, SG:       119.81.28.170:            33.68 MiB/s |  269.46 Mbps
Softlayer, Seoul, KR:           119.81.28.170:            33.27 MiB/s |  266.17 Mbps
Softlayer, HongKong, CN:        119.81.130.170:           63.52 MiB/s |  508.19 Mbps
Softlayer, Dallas, TX:          169.48.124.82:             3.76 MiB/s |   30.07 Mbps
Softlayer, Seattle, WA:         67.228.112.250:           12.20 MiB/s |   97.58 Mbps
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE:       159.122.69.4:              3.44 MiB/s |   27.55 Mbps
Softlayer, Paris, FR:           159.8.64.212:              7.42 MiB/s |   59.34 Mbps
Leaseweb, HongKong, CN:         43.249.36.49:             17.69 MiB/s |  141.55 Mbps
Leaseweb, Singapore, SG:        103.254.153.18:           23.10 MiB/s |  184.81 Mbps
Leaseweb, Washington D.C., US:  207.244.94.80:             3.57 MiB/s |   28.54 Mbps
Leaseweb, San Francisco, US:    209.58.135.187:            5.12 MiB/s |   40.99 Mbps
Leaseweb, Netherlands, NL:      5.79.108.33:               4.65 MiB/s |   37.23 Mbps
OVH, Montreal, CA:              192.99.19.165:             4.84 MiB/s |   38.73 Mbps
Hinet, Taiwan, TW:              210.61.132.1:             92.06 MiB/s |  736.46 Mbps

国内速度

安徽合肥电信:             61.191.111.11:             3.73 MiB/s |   29.85 Mbps
江苏南京电信:             202.102.23.133:            1.26 MiB/s |   10.10 Mbps
江西南昌电信:             182.98.238.226:            1.14 MiB/s |    9.13 Mbps
新疆昌吉电信:             61.128.107.242:            1.98 MiB/s |   15.82 Mbps
安徽合肥联通:             112.122.10.26:           624.47 KiB/s |    4.88 Mbps
山东济南联通:             221.214.108.58:            9.83 MiB/s |   78.63 Mbps
吉林长春联通:             221.9.246.35:              4.11 MiB/s |   32.89 Mbps
湖北武汉联通:             113.57.249.2:             34.63 MiB/s |  277.01 Mbps
西藏拉萨联通:             221.13.70.244:            12.17 MiB/s |   97.35 Mbps
辽宁沈阳联通:             175.167.135.234:               0 B/s |      N/A     
山西太原联通:             218.26.109.107:           25.58 MiB/s |  204.67 Mbps
江苏南京联通:             153.37.96.226:             6.35 MiB/s |   50.82 Mbps
安徽合肥移动:             120.209.140.60:                0 B/s |      N/A     
山西太原移动:             183.203.24.210:            0.96 MiB/s |    7.69 Mbps
四川成都移动:             183.221.247.9:           161.94 KiB/s |    1.27 Mbps
新疆昌吉移动:             117.190.59.82:           157.46 KiB/s |    1.23 Mbps
吉林长春移动:             111.26.139.78:           867.55 KiB/s |    6.78 Mbps
西藏拉萨移动:             211.139.74.234:          261.60 KiB/s |    2.04 Mbps
辽宁沈阳移动:             221.180.176.102:         856.73 KiB/s |    6.69 Mbps
湖北武汉移动:             111.48.26.136:           508.72 KiB/s |    3.97 Mbps
四川成都教育网:          202.115.1.138:             0.98 MiB/s |    7.80 Mbps

回程路由

===== 测试 [安徽合肥电信] 的回程路由 =====
traceroute to speedtest1.ah163.com (61.191.111.11), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.88.89.254  0.24 ms  http: error  http: error
 2  h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254)  3.25 ms  
 3  pcpc-3302.hinet.net (168.95.75.50)  2.30 ms  
 4  tpdt-3022.hinet.net (220.128.4.10)  2.26 ms 
 5  tpdt-3012.hinet.net (220.128.27.5)  4.81 ms  
 6  r4105-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.12.201)  1.55 ms  
 9  *
10  202.97.94.125  34.08 ms 
11  202.97.82.81  57.49 ms
12  202.97.59.130  65.73 ms
13  *
14  *
15  61.190.246.6  67.44 ms 
16  61.191.111.11  66.40 ms

===== 回程 [安徽合肥电信] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [江苏南京电信] 的回程路由 =====
traceroute to 4gnanjing1.speedtest.jsinfo.net (202.102.23.133), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.88.89.254  0.24 ms  http: error  http: error
 2  h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254)  1.03 ms
 4  tpdt-3022.hinet.net (220.128.4.10)  1.32 ms
 3  pcpc-3302.hinet.net (168.95.75.50)  6.44 ms
 6  r4106-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.11.177)  1.66 ms
 7  r4006-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.10.201)  2.02 ms
 8  202.97.4.73  24.47 ms
 9  202.97.94.89  23.10 ms
10  202.97.94.125  28.63 ms
11  202.97.64.122  25.56 ms
12  202.97.65.149  54.62 ms
13  202.102.36.122  54.15 ms
14  202.102.23.30  53.24 ms
15  202.102.23.133  54.03 ms

===== 回程 [江苏南京电信] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [江西南昌电信] 的回程路由 =====
traceroute to swxwyzx.f3322.net (182.98.238.226), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.88.89.254  0.22 ms  http: error  http: error
 2  h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254)  1.51 ms
 5  tpdt-3012.hinet.net (220.128.25.181)  5.18 ms 
 6  r4106-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.11.181)  2.04 ms 
 7  r4006-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.10.201)  2.48 ms
 8  202.97.51.49  36.75 ms 
 9  202.97.90.54  69.40 ms
10  202.97.57.154  51.18 ms
11  202.97.75.138  54.16 ms
12  182.98.241.210  50.02 ms
13  182.98.238.225  56.31 ms
14  182.98.238.226  43.42 ms

===== 回程 [江西南昌电信] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [新疆昌吉电信] 的回程路由 =====
traceroute to 61.128.107.242 (61.128.107.242), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.88.89.254  0.22 ms  http: error  http: error
 2  h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254)  1.15 ms 
 3  pcpc-3301.hinet.net (168.95.74.78)  16.01 ms 
 4  tpdb-3021.hinet.net (220.128.3.10)  2.16 ms
 7  r4006-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.6.173)  1.99 ms
 8  202.97.4.21  34.47 ms 
 9  202.97.61.78  34.87 ms
10  202.97.34.53  33.68 ms
11  202.97.57.158  40.25 ms
12  202.97.33.206  54.73 ms
13  202.97.24.50  96.82 ms 
14  222.83.20.253  95.96 ms
15  222.83.20.146  97.04 ms
16  *
17  61.128.107.242  92.12 ms 
===== 回程 [新疆昌吉电信] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [安徽合肥联通] 的回程路由 =====
traceroute to 112.122.10.26 (112.122.10.26), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.88.89.254  0.27 ms
 2  h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254)  1.12 ms
 3  pcpc-3302.hinet.net (168.95.75.50)  1.11 ms
 4  tpdt-3022.hinet.net (220.128.4.10)  2.39 ms
 5  tpdt-3012.hinet.net (220.128.25.89)  5.34 ms
 6  r4105-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.12.201)  1.92 ms
 7  r4005-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.10.193)  5.49 ms 
 8  219.158.34.157  26.97 ms
 9  219.158.24.133  25.31 ms
10  219.158.24.125  26.43 ms 
11  219.158.8.162  44.26 ms
12  *
13  58.242.193.74  52.94 ms 
14  58.242.193.134  61.96 ms 
17  112.122.10.26  45.42 ms 
===== 回程 [安徽合肥联通] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [山东济南联通] 的回程路由 =====
traceroute to speedtest.jnltwy.com (221.214.108.58), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.88.89.254  0.24 ms  http: error  http: error
 2  h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254)  1.59 ms
 6  r4106-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.11.181)  1.63 ms
 5  tpdt-3012.hinet.net (220.128.25.181)  4.23 ms
 9  219.158.113.142  34.59 ms 
10  *
11  219.158.23.42  44.45 ms
12  119.164.53.30  51.87 ms
13  221.0.5.174  55.50 ms
16  221.214.108.58  53.28 ms

===== 回程 [山东济南联通] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [湖北武汉联通] 的回程路由 =====
traceroute to 113.57.249.2 (113.57.249.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.88.89.254  0.22 ms
 2  h254.s98.ts.hinet.net (168.95.98.254)  1.34 ms
 3  pcpc-3301.hinet.net (168.95.74.50)  1.35 ms
 4  tpdb-3021.hinet.net (220.128.3.10)  1.60 ms
 5  tpdt-3011.hinet.net (220.128.24.181)  1.86 ms 
 6  r4105-s2.tp.hinet.net (220.128.12.125)  16.31 ms  
 9  219.158.103.29  31.01 ms
10  219.158.8.117  27.79 ms
11  219.158.8.162  45.57 ms
12  58.19.109.254  39.67 ms  
13  218.104.110.18  41.09 ms 
14  113.57.249.2  40.57 ms 

===== 回程 [湖北武汉联通] 路由测试结束 =====

 

 

国内延迟

【安徽合肥电信】 - speedtest1.ah163.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 66.661/66.959/67.328/0.373 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【江苏南京电信】 - 4gnanjing1.speedtest.jsinfo.net
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9429ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 68.847/79.315/91.093/6.290 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【江西南昌电信】 - swxwyzx.f3322.net
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 60.077/60.608/61.842/0.591 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【新疆昌吉电信】 - 61.128.107.242
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 105.160/105.689/108.105/0.941 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【安徽合肥联通】 - 112.122.10.26
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.584/39.986/40.808/0.453 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【山东济南联通】 - speedtest.jnltwy.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.654/32.158/32.932/0.381 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【湖北武汉联通】 - 113.57.249.2
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.393/37.933/38.785/0.470 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【西藏拉萨联通】 - 221.13.70.244
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 85.564/86.378/90.342/1.357 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【辽宁沈阳联通】 - speedtest1.online.ln.cn
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9206ms

----------------------------------------------------------------------
【山西太原联通】 - speedtest.sxunicomjzjk.cn
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9212ms

----------------------------------------------------------------------
【江苏南京联通】 - speedtest02.js165.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9013ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.406/35.758/36.483/0.303 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【安徽合肥移动】 - 4gtest.ahydnet.com
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9210ms

----------------------------------------------------------------------
【山西太原移动】 - sp.sx.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 69.142/79.343/81.647/3.512 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【四川成都移动】 - 183.221.247.9
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9032ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 80.615/713.308/1658.822/535.986 ms, pipe 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【新疆昌吉移动】 - speedtest5.xj.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 125.596/134.402/142.034/4.840 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【吉林长春移动】 - speedtest2.jl.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 83.653/92.506/100.508/4.730 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【西藏拉萨移动】 - speedtest1.xz.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 124.647/130.439/136.347/3.676 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【辽宁沈阳移动】 - speedtest1.ln.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, +10 errors, 100% packet loss, time 9131ms
pipe 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【湖北武汉移动】 - speedtest1.hb.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 67.279/67.723/68.777/0.479 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【四川成都教育网】 - sp1.uestc.edu.cn
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 202.050/202.565/204.176/0.792 ms

简评:VDS性能很不错,带宽充足。不过Hinet动态不同IP段到国内的表现不太一样,所以可以尽量换到出口走上海的IP段使用。

原创文章,作者:Jcyt,如若转载,请注明出处:https://liyuans.com/2019/01/pqs-hinet-2.html

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

联系我们

TG: PCCWGlobal
Mail: pccwbtn$gmail.com