1. 首页
  2. VDS

PQS: 测评 / HKT / VDS / 2G内存 / 1Gbps / 无限流量 / NAT售价138CNY起 / 面板入门玩家友好

 

第二批HKT-VDS还在拉线~~~~

PQS,TW商家,介绍过几次了,既老板开卖Hinet已经过去三个月了,目前老板又开卖了HKT家宽。据老板客户群反映,网络速度很不错

老板TG Teson T

频道:PQSnews

群组:MJJtw

再次赞一下老板处理工单的速度,且面板自带多个按照ID分配的ddns,NAT机器面板自带查询宿主机IP以及可用端口功能,VDS机器提供自助换IP功能,对新手友好度较高。目前HKT仅NAT有货,VDS第一批价格是958CNY,后边的批次应该是会涨价

套餐详情

以下套餐1均可用骨折碼PQS2019MJJ88

HKT1000M01NATVPS
  • vCPU:1
  • 内存:512MB
  • 硬盘:8GB SSD
  • 流量:不限(可重置担需合理使用)
  • 带宽:共享1Gbps
  • 架构:KVM
  • 价格:¥138/月
  • 订购链接
HKT1000M02NATVPS
  • vCPU:1
  • 内存:1GB
  • 硬盘:16GB SSD
  • 流量:不限(可重置但需合理使用)
  • 带宽:共享1Gbps
  • 架构:KVM
  • 价格:¥178/月
  • 订购链接

测评详情

 基本信息

带宽测试

PQS: 测评 / HKT / VDS / 2G内存 / 1Gbps / 无限流量 / NAT售价138CNY起 / 面板入门玩家友好

上传速度不太够但是港内HKBN-1G-VDS wget速度正常,初步推测speedtest节点的问题?

PQS: 测评 / HKT / VDS / 2G内存 / 1Gbps / 无限流量 / NAT售价138CNY起 / 面板入门玩家友好

 基本信息

本次评测的是2C2G的VDS,感谢商家提供测试机

CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1231 v3 @ 3.40GHz
Number of cores      : 2
CPU frequency        : 3398.030 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 19.0 GB (1.6 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 2004 MB (42 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 2047 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 0 hour 17 min
Load average         : 0.07, 0.02, 0.00
OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 9
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 4.9.0-4-amd64
ipaddr               : 中国 香港   pccw.com
vm                   : kvm

硬盘速度

ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 20.4 us / 31.0 us / 1.74 ms / 7.29 us
ioping: sequential speed
    generated 28.6 k requests in 5.00 s, 6.98 GiB, 5.71 k iops, 1.40 GiB/s

Unixbench

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: hkghost02.vds.pqs.pw: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.9.0-4-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.9.65-3+deb9u1 (2017-12-23)
   Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1231 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6796.1 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1231 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6796.1 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   03:06:02 up 31 min,  0 users,  load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01; runlevel 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 20 2019 03:06:02 - 03:34:23
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       38838247.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4268.2 MWIPS (11.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               6091.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1409600.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          390357.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3108865.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2863083.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 369356.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              13198.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  14489.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2914.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        4040799.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   38838247.7   3328.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4268.2    776.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       6091.5   1416.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1409600.3   3559.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     390357.0   2358.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3108865.8   5360.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2863083.0   2301.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     369356.8    923.4
Process Creation                                126.0      13198.3   1047.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      14489.8   3417.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2914.5   4857.4
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4040799.7   2693.9
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2245.0

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 20 2019 03:34:23 - 04:02:45
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       77318547.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     8478.3 MWIPS (11.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              13635.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1697943.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          437757.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       4570673.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             5718505.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 708414.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              31960.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  24262.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   3194.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        6337363.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   77318547.4   6625.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       8478.3   1541.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      13635.0   3170.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1697943.7   4287.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     437757.9   2645.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    4570673.6   7880.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    5718505.5   4596.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     708414.7   1771.0
Process Creation                                126.0      31960.8   2536.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      24262.8   5722.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       3194.7   5324.5
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    6337363.7   4224.9
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3748.4
虽然只有两核心,但是性能相对来说比较强劲

海外速度

Node Name:                      IPv4 address:                  Download Speed
CacheFly:                       204.93.150.152:           23.94 MiB/s |  191.53 Mbps
Linode, Tokyo, JP:              106.187.96.148:           36.33 MiB/s |  290.64 Mbps
Linode, Tokyo2, JP:             139.162.65.37:            11.10 MiB/s |   88.80 Mbps
Linode, Singapore, SG:          139.162.23.4:             52.87 MiB/s |  422.96 Mbps
Linode, Fremont, CA:            50.116.14.9:               6.69 MiB/s |   53.53 Mbps
Linode, Newark, NJ:             50.116.57.237:             8.83 MiB/s |   70.63 Mbps
Linode, London, UK:             176.58.107.39:            10.78 MiB/s |   86.22 Mbps
Linode, Frankfurt, DE:          139.162.130.8:            12.03 MiB/s |   96.23 Mbps
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP:           161.202.125.20:           38.30 MiB/s |  306.38 Mbps
Softlayer, Singapore, SG:       119.81.28.170:            13.04 MiB/s |  104.36 Mbps
Softlayer, Seoul, KR:           119.81.28.170:            13.13 MiB/s |  105.05 Mbps
Softlayer, HongKong, CN:        119.81.130.170:          103.46 MiB/s |  827.65 Mbps
Softlayer, Dallas, TX:          169.48.124.82:             9.43 MiB/s |   75.47 Mbps
Softlayer, Seattle, WA:         67.228.112.250:           13.75 MiB/s |  110.00 Mbps
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE:       159.122.69.4:             11.70 MiB/s |   93.62 Mbps
Softlayer, Paris, FR:           159.8.64.212:             11.26 MiB/s |   90.10 Mbps
Leaseweb, HongKong, CN:         43.249.36.49:             67.03 MiB/s |  536.23 Mbps
Leaseweb, Singapore, SG:        103.254.153.18:           30.02 MiB/s |  240.18 Mbps
Leaseweb, Washington D.C., US:  207.244.94.80:             9.90 MiB/s |   79.22 Mbps
Leaseweb, San Francisco, US:    209.58.135.187:            2.22 MiB/s |   17.73 Mbps
Leaseweb, Netherlands, NL:      5.79.108.33:              11.61 MiB/s |   92.91 Mbps
OVH, Montreal, CA:              192.99.19.165:             8.75 MiB/s |   69.98 Mbps
Hinet, Taiwan, TW:              210.61.132.1:             64.94 MiB/s |  519.52 Mbps

国内速度

安徽合肥电信:             61.191.111.11:            15.75 MiB/s |  126.04 Mbps
江苏南京电信:             202.102.23.133:           13.70 MiB/s |  109.61 Mbps
江西南昌电信:             182.98.238.226:          833.13 KiB/s |    6.51 Mbps
新疆昌吉电信:             61.128.107.242:                0 B/s |      N/A     
安徽合肥联通:             112.122.10.26:             2.85 MiB/s |   22.81 Mbps
山东济南联通:             221.214.108.58:            4.46 MiB/s |   35.65 Mbps
吉林长春联通:             221.9.246.35:              2.79 MiB/s |   22.33 Mbps
湖北武汉联通:             113.57.249.2:              3.73 MiB/s |   29.82 Mbps
西藏拉萨联通:             221.13.70.244:                 0 B/s |      N/A     
辽宁沈阳联通:             175.167.135.234:               0 B/s |      N/A     
山西太原联通:             218.26.109.107:            7.08 MiB/s |   56.62 Mbps
江苏南京联通:             153.37.96.226:            11.63 MiB/s |   93.07 Mbps
安徽合肥移动:             120.209.140.60:                0 B/s |      N/A     
山西太原移动:             183.203.24.210:           33.19 MiB/s |  265.49 Mbps
四川成都移动:             183.221.247.9:           367.37 KiB/s |    2.87 Mbps
新疆昌吉移动:             117.190.59.82:            10.81 MiB/s |   86.50 Mbps
吉林长春移动:             111.26.139.78:            32.19 MiB/s |  257.50 Mbps
西藏拉萨移动:             211.139.74.234:          495.12 KiB/s |    3.87 Mbps
辽宁沈阳移动:             221.180.176.102:          35.30 MiB/s |  282.41 Mbps

回程路由

===== 测试 [安徽合肥电信] 的回程路由 =====
traceroute to speedtest1.ah163.com (61.191.111.11), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.87.88.254  0.13 ms  *  局域网
 2  n220246130253.netvigator.com (220.246.130.253)  0.66 ms  AS4760  中国 香港 pccw.com
 3  10.193.230.214  1.89 ms  *  局域网
 4  wtsc3a018.netvigator.com (218.102.40.18)  2.45 ms  AS4760  中国 香港 pccw.com
 5  ten0-1-1-1.br04.hkg05.pccwbtn.net (63.218.255.241)  2.46 ms  AS3491  中国 香港 pccw.com
 6  202.97.122.118  2.12 ms  AS4134  中国 香港 电信
 7  202.97.122.117  2.03 ms  AS4134  中国 香港 电信
 8  202.97.25.229  28.14 ms  AS4134  中国 上海 电信
 9  *
10  202.97.62.73  37.11 ms  AS4134  中国 上海 电信
11  *
12  *
13  *
14  61.190.246.6  44.18 ms  AS4134  中国 安徽 合肥 电信
15  *
16  *
17  *
18  61.191.111.11  44.11 ms  AS4134  中国 安徽 合肥 电信
===== 测试 [安徽合肥联通] 的回程路由 =====
traceroute to 112.122.10.26 (112.122.10.26), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.87.88.254  0.18 ms  *  局域网
 2  n220246130253.netvigator.com (220.246.130.253)  0.77 ms  AS4760  中国 香港 pccw.com
 3  10.193.230.213  1.10 ms  *  局域网
 4  wtsc3a042.netvigator.com (218.102.40.42)  1.51 ms  AS4760  中国 香港 pccw.com
 5  63.218.215.245  1.92 ms  AS3491  中国 香港 pccw.com
 6  219.158.38.66  2.35 ms  AS4837  中国 香港 联通
 7  219.158.38.65  2.73 ms  AS4837  中国 香港 联通
 8  219.158.10.53  11.79 ms  AS4837  中国 湖北 武汉 联通
 9  219.158.103.37  12.51 ms  AS4837  中国 广东 广州 联通
10  219.158.103.217  15.72 ms  AS4837  中国 广东 广州 联通
11  219.158.6.233  39.74 ms  AS4837  中国 上海 联通
12  219.158.97.62  45.71 ms  AS4837  中国 安徽 合肥 联通
13  58.242.193.78  52.47 ms  AS4837  中国 安徽 合肥 联通
14  58.242.193.130  58.83 ms  AS4837  中国 安徽 合肥 联通
15  112.122.10.26  39.83 ms  AS4837  中国 安徽 合肥 联通

===== 测试 [安徽合肥移动] 的回程路由 =====
traceroute to 4gtest.ahydnet.com (120.209.140.60), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.87.88.254  1.84 ms  *  局域网
 2  n220246130253.netvigator.com (220.246.130.253)  0.63 ms  AS4760  中国 香港 pccw.com
 3  10.193.230.214  1.73 ms  *  局域网
 4  wtsc3a018.netvigator.com (218.102.40.18)  1.70 ms  AS4760  中国 香港 pccw.com
 5  63-218-231-41.static.pccwglobal.net (63.218.231.41)  172.13 ms  AS3491  德国 黑森州 法兰克福 pccw.com
 6  TenGE0-1-0-12.br01.frf08.pccwbtn.net (63.223.13.138)  171.60 ms  AS3491  德国 黑森州 法兰克福 pccw.com
 7  ffm-b4-link.telia.net (213.248.68.70)  171.22 ms  AS1299  德国 黑森州 法兰克福 telia.com
 8  ffm-bb3-link.telia.net (62.115.120.1)  171.92 ms  AS1299  德国 黑森州 法兰克福 telia.com
 9  prs-bb3-link.telia.net (62.115.123.13)  175.16 ms  AS1299  法国 法兰西岛大区 巴黎 telia.com
10  ldn-bb3-link.telia.net (62.115.134.93)  179.65 ms  AS1299  英国 伦敦 telia.com
11  ldn-b1-link.telia.net (62.115.114.235)  180.39 ms  AS1299  英国 伦敦 telia.com
12  chinamobile-ic-311724-ldn-b1.c.telia.net (62.115.12.242)  240.56 ms  AS1299  英国 伦敦 telia.com
13  221.183.30.217  285.40 ms  AS9808  中国 北京 移动
14  221.183.46.254  288.16 ms  AS9808  中国 北京 移动
15  221.176.21.145  292.05 ms  AS9808  中国 北京 移动
16  221.176.21.134  303.20 ms  AS9808  中国 上海 移动
17  *
18  221.183.19.130  318.66 ms  AS9808  中国 安徽 合肥 移动
19  *
20  120.209.143.178  322.84 ms  AS9808  中国 安徽 合肥 移动
21  120.209.143.82  323.73 ms  AS9808  中国 安徽 合肥 移动
22  *
23  *

 

 

国内延迟

----------------------------------------------------------------------
【安徽合肥电信】 - speedtest1.ah163.com
10 packets transmitted, 8 received, 20% packet loss, time 9057ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 42.736/44.017/45.680/1.037 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【江苏南京电信】 - 4gnanjing1.speedtest.jsinfo.net
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 71.688/95.125/118.933/13.068 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【江西南昌电信】 - swxwyzx.f3322.net
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 64.192/83.315/96.405/8.394 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【新疆昌吉电信】 - 61.128.107.242
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9204ms

----------------------------------------------------------------------
【安徽合肥联通】 - 112.122.10.26
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.627/39.727/39.850/0.210 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【山东济南联通】 - speedtest.jnltwy.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9013ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 46.343/46.464/46.653/0.172 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【湖北武汉联通】 - 113.57.249.2
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.440/23.522/23.675/0.150 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【西藏拉萨联通】 - 221.13.70.244
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9211ms

----------------------------------------------------------------------
【辽宁沈阳联通】 - speedtest1.online.ln.cn
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9218ms

----------------------------------------------------------------------
【山西太原联通】 - speedtest.sxunicomjzjk.cn
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9201ms

----------------------------------------------------------------------
【江苏南京联通】 - speedtest02.js165.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.480/34.555/34.692/0.175 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【安徽合肥移动】 - 4gtest.ahydnet.com
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9201ms

----------------------------------------------------------------------
【山西太原移动】 - sp.sx.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 10353ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 46.107/55.374/59.718/4.710 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【四川成都移动】 - 183.221.247.9
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 61.707/62.171/64.408/0.756 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【新疆昌吉移动】 - speedtest5.xj.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 101.689/102.211/104.551/0.866 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【吉林长春移动】 - speedtest2.jl.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 58.086/59.963/61.367/1.428 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------

简评:机器性能不错,港内带宽充足。不过移动到HKT在晚上会在HKIX处爆炸,总的来说,属于性价比较高的产品,适合大流量业务

原创文章,作者:Jcyt,如若转载,请注明出处:https://liyuans.com/2019/03/pqs-hkt.html

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

联系我们

在线咨询:点击这里给我发消息

邮件:liyuan.leon@gmail.com

时间:工作日9:30 - 18:30